Neanderthals not “autistic” / More DNA

Warning: inflated conclusions re: Autism and Neanderthal.  Abundant weasel words; illogical “Autism” diagnosis. 

UW prof delves into why we got genes linked to autism, but Neanderthals didn’t

by Alan Boyle on August 3, 2016 at 8:53 pm

One of the biggest genetic differences between humans and other members of the primate family tree, including Neanderthals, predisposes people to a type of autism. The stretch of DNA appears to be an important piece of the human genome, but why?

University of Washington genome scientist Evan Eichler and his colleagues on an international research team focus on that question in a study published today by the journal Nature.

The key genetic structure consists of 95,000 molecular base pairs in a region on chromosome 16 that’s known as 16p11.2. The structure includes 28 genes, flanked by blocks of DNA with duplicated sequences of genetic code known as copy-number variants. Eichler’s team compared the genomes of modern humans with the genetic code for chimps, gorillas and orangutans, as well as the code for Neanderthals and another strain of extinct pre-humans known as Denisovans. (Actually, the Denisovan or Denisova hominin is an extinct species or subspecies of human in the genus Homo. Pending its status as either species or subspecies it currently carries the temporary names Homo sp. Altai, or Homo sapiens ssp. Denisova. WIKI

Humans were the only ones to have the structure in the 16p11.2 region.

The researchers’ analysis indicates that the structure appeared in our ancestors’ genome (Which ancestors? No one seems to agree as to who these people were!)relatively suddenly, about 280,000 years ago. That time frame is about 80,000 years before anatomically modern humans – that is, Homo sapiens – show up in the fossil record. Confusion over the vocabulary related to “human evolution” dominates discussion and communication in the U.S.; the result is a reversion to “us vs. them” modern narcissism. 

“Most duplications in our genome are millions of years old, and the speed at which this structure transformed our genome is unprecedented,” Eichler said in a news release.

Researchers have previously taken note of the structure in 16p11.2 because a mutation that results in the deletion of genetic code is correlated with about 1 percent of autism cases.

Note: What this points to is that 1 % of “people” diagnosed with “Autism” actually have a genetic deletion that results in xyz symptoms! 

But the structure also contains a beneficial gene called BOLA2. That gene seems to play a part in helping cells capture iron more efficiently and making iron available to proteins that need it.

The iron-building benefit is most pronounced early in cell development. “This ability to help humans to acquire and use this essential element early in life might confer a significant enough benefit to outweigh the risk of having some offspring with autism,” Eichler said.

If you were to calculate the ACTUAL risk, that risk would be nonexistent.   

There are a couple of additional twists to the tale: One is that the structure in the 16p11.2 appears to include a new gene that was created by fusing two regions of a BOLA2 gene with three regions from another gene. “We’re going to work with other research teams to find out what it does, but so far we haven’t a clue,” Eichler said. Honesty! How novel. 

Insert “magical connection”: the coincidence that a relative has been diagnosed with “Autism” is supposed to somehow impart import to the research.

The other twist is that Eichler has an autistic niece who’s now in her 20s. He’s always wondered why some children are born with autism while others are not. Well, millions of people have “Autistic” relatives and wonder, Why? And people without such  relatives also wonder, Why? It’s irrelevant to the validity of the research. 

“With genome technologies and our understanding of genetics and genomes, we’re now just beginning to crack the case,” Eichler said. “My hope is that in five to 10 years, you would treat children with different genetic causes of autism with different therapies that would be tailored really for those specific kids.”

Yes, but logically, they would no longer be diagnosed with “Autism” but as having a specific genetic condition. 

In addition to Eichler, 29 other researchers are co-authors of the Nature paper, titled “Emergence of a Homo Sapiens-Specific Gene Family and Chromosome 16p11.2 CNV Susceptibility.” Eichler is an investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute as well as a UW professor of genome sciences.





Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s