(Literal) Human Sacrifice and the Social Order

I would add that “literal” human sacrifice (soldiers in war) is not the only type of “sacrifice” utilized to prop up the socio-economic order that is American Capitalism. Also, that human sacrifice originated as cannibalism that was later “ritualized” to serve social purposes.  
Scientific American Arts & Culture

How Human Sacrifice Propped Up the Social Order

By Philip Ball, April 5, 2016

Understanding the role of state-sanctioned killing does more than illuminate the social evolution of “premodern” cultures

James Frazer’s classic anthropological study The Golden Bough contains a harrowing chapter on human sacrifice in rituals of crop fertility and harvest among historical cultures around the world. Frazer describes sacrificial victims being crushed under huge toppling stones, slow-roasted over fires and dismembered alive.

Frazer’s methods of analysis wouldn’t all pass muster among anthropologists today (his work was first published in 1890), but it is hard not to conclude from his descriptions that what industrialized societies today would regard as the most extreme psychopathy has in the past been seen as normal—and indeed sacred—behaviour.

In almost all societies, killing within a tribe or clan has been strongly taboo; exemption is granted only to those with great authority. Anthropologists have suspected that ritual human sacrifice serves to cement power structures—that is, it signifies who sits at the top of the social hierarchy.

Sacrifice for social order

The idea makes intuitive sense, but until now there has been no clear evidence to support it. In a study published in Nature, Joseph Watts, a specialist in cultural evolution at the University of Auckland in New Zealand, and his colleagues have analysed 93 traditional cultures in Austronesia (the region that loosely embraces the many small and island states in the Pacific and Indonesia) as they were before they were influenced by colonization and major world religions (generally in the late 19th and early 20th centuries).

By delving into ethnographic records, the researchers tried to tease out the relationship between human sacrifice and social hierarchy. They find that the prevalence of sacrifice increased with the degree of social stratification: it occurred in 25% of cultures with little or no stratification, 37% of those with moderately stratified societies, and 67% of those that had a pronounced hierarchy.

And by mapping the evolutionary relationships between cultures, the team suggests that human sacrifice and social hierarchy co-evolved. Although societies can become more or less stratified over time, societies that practised sacrifice were less apt to revert to milder degrees of stratification.

In other words, human sacrifice seems to bolster stratification: it helped to stabilize hierarchy, and conceivably, therefore, had a common role in the development of highly stratified societies that generally persist even today.

Religious undertones

Human sacrifice seems to have been largely the privilege of priests or others who claimed religious authority. Watts and colleagues say that their results therefore disclose a “dark side” to the social role of religion. (They have previously shown that belief in supernatural punishing agencies in Austronesian cultures encouraged moral observance, and thereby promoted the emergence of stratified and complex social structures).

There’s a danger of overgeneralization from any study of this kind. Human sacrifice is no more likely than, for instance, music to have had a single role in early societies. In the third century bc, for example, Chinese administrator Li Bing eliminated the sacrifice of young maidens to a river god during the conquest of Sichuan by the First Emperor. Some have suggested that he called the bluff of a local racket in which families rid themselves of unwanted daughters while getting rich on the compensation they received. Whether or not that is true, it’s easy to imagine how rituals could be abused for prosaic gain.

And even in Austronesia, add Watts’s team, sacrifice wasn’t always conducted for purely religious reasons. It could have other motivations, including to punish taboo violations, demoralize underclasses, mark class boundaries and instil fear of social elites, all of which aim at building and maintaining social control. For this reason, says Michael Winkelman, an anthropologist now retired from Arizona State University in Tempe, “I suspect that Watts et al. are assessing some general notion of social legitimated killing.”

Such considerations complicate any interpretation of Watts’s results, but it also gives them considerably more contemporary resonance.

Death-penalty parallels

By today’s standards, human sacrifice scarcely seems to fall within the norms of good morality. But one doesn’t need to be a moral relativist to accept that the connections between human sacrifice, obedience to authority and stable governance persist. To perceive a link between ancient, “savage” human sacrifices and the death penalty in some modern societies isn’t to exaggerate or indulge in melodrama, as Winkelman’s remarks testify.

Certainly the suggestion could seem glib, and the parallels cannot be taken too far. Unlike today’s death penalties, traditional ritual sacrifice was generally for religious purposes and it tended to exhibit no bloodlust or contempt for the victims. Often they were seen as godlike, and before their sacrifice, they might be treated with reverence and affection, and perhaps fed well like the biblical fatted calf. The remains of the dead body—it’s not even clear whether the word “victim” is appropriate—were imbued with power. If the flesh was chopped up, it was to share out this potent relic among the tribe.

Yet a contemporary state’s arrogation of the right to slaughter through the death penalty—breaking an otherwise rigid prohibition—still serves as, among other things, a demonstration of authority and a ritual of appeasement, whether towards supposed religious strictures or public opinion.

To future anthropologists, whatever explanations or justifications states offer today for imposing capital punishment may seem less revealing than the broader view of how such sanctified killing reinforces the social order. We can expect time’s retrospective gaze to lay bare the real reasons why we, no less than the ancient Aztecs or Samoans, valorize murder.

This article was first published on April 5, 2016.

see also:

Washington Post / The ‘darker link’ between ancient human sacrifice and our modern world   / April 5, 2016

 

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “(Literal) Human Sacrifice and the Social Order

  1. And, of course, the most potent form of ‘magic(k)’ involves that ultimate expression of domination known as ‘ritual murder’ / human sacrifice.

    In doing so, one fuels further ‘the fires of hell’ – ‘keeps the home-fires burning’ -and exemplifies oneself as ‘a chosen vassal of Brimstone’.

    Cussed Normies! All of them want to be ‘the god’! (Of this world). Don’t they realize that when you hold the world in a death-grip it will be (ultimately) your end? (As in it will mash you like sysiphus) That the sword *always* has two mouths – much as if each such blade was a species of ‘solidified demon’? (As in Elric…)

    Like

    • Thus the “instinct” for Armageddon, for an ultimate limit to man “stealing fire-power” from the gods and totally screwing it up. An unconscious recognition of the human failure to respect anything; not “god”, the cosmic order, the environment – truly our “mother” Earth; fatalities of the “narcissistic insistence” on being the center of the universe. How convenient! The “forces of creation” are removed to a non-existence in a “supernatural” non-reality, where they cannot “do anything” real in retaliation for their “death”: reduced to toys, images, puppets of predatory man. “The authority” to kill other humans in purposeful, ritual fashion iS to steal “life” from the gods – to declare oneself to be a god.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s