Still Puritan After All These Years / New York Times


New York Times Sunday Review / Gray Matter

By 2012

“I THINK I can see the whole destiny of America contained in the first Puritan who landed on those shores,” the French political thinker Alexis de Tocqueville wrote after visiting the United States in the 1830s. Was he right? Do present-day Americans still exhibit, in their attitudes and behavior, traces of those austere English Protestants who started arriving in the country in the early 17th century?

It seems we do. Consider a series of experiments conducted by researchers led by the psychologist Eric Luis Uhlmann and published last year in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. (How appropriate, since contemporary American Psychology is a legacy of Puritanical hatred of “natural” human nature.) In one study, they investigated whether the work habits of today’s Americans reflected the so-called Protestant work ethic. Martin Luther and John Calvin argued that work was a calling from God. They also believed in predestination and viewed success as a sign of salvation. This led to belief in success as a path to salvation: hard work and good deeds would bring rewards, in life and after. (Success is defined today by psychologists as adherence to their narrow definition of “normal social behavior” This is a religious obsession; a mission to expose, define and “correct” human pathologies that encompass almost all human behavior and thought; it’s “salvation” by medication and cognitive “conversion”)

In the study, American and Canadian college students were asked to solve word puzzles involving anagrams. But first, some were subtly exposed to (or “primed” with) salvation-related words like “heaven” and “redeem,” while others were exposed to neutral words. The researchers found that the Americans — but not the Canadians — solved more anagrams with salvation on the mind. They worked harder.

Professor Uhlmann and his colleagues also conducted an experiment to see if Americans shared the prudishness of the Puritans. They found that American students judged promiscuous women more harshly than British students did.

In a third experiment, the researchers asked Asian-Americans to rate their support for a school principal who had canceled a prom because of sexually charged dancing and also to rate their support for a school that had banned revealing clothing. But first, the researchers primed the participants with thoughts of either their Asian or their American heritage, as well as with thoughts of work or another topic. They found that the participants showed increased approval of the prudish school officials when primed with thoughts of work — if they had also been primed with their American heritage, but not when primed with their Asian heritage. These results suggest a tight Puritanical intermingling of work, sex and morality in the American mind.

Protestant attitudes about work may also influence how Americans treat their co-workers. Calvin argued that socializing while on the job was a distraction from the assignment God gave you. The psychologist Jeffrey Sanchez-Burks has found that Protestants — but not Catholics — become less sensitive to others’ emotions when reminded of work, possibly indicating a tendency to judge fraternizing as unproductive and unprofessional. He and collaborators have also found that Americans have a culturally specific tendency to view family photos and other personal items as unprofessional presences in the office.

Not all of the legacy of Puritanism suggests moral uprightness. Studies since the ’70s have also found that Americans who score high on a Protestant Ethic Scale (emphasizing self-reliance and self-discipline) or similar metric show marked prejudice against racial minorities and the poor; hostility toward social welfare efforts; and, among obese women, self-denigration.

Why the persistence of Puritanism in American life? “New England exercised a disproportionate influence on American ideals,” the historian John Coffey says, “thanks to a powerful intellectual tradition disseminated through its universities, its dynamic print culture and the writings of its famous clergy.” He also notes the power of Evangelicalism as a carrier of Puritan values and America’s resistance, compared with other largely Protestant nations, to secularization. (Psychology has taken over the role of “enforcer” of Puritanical values in every aspect of American life.)

It’s hard to say for sure that any given element of the American psyche results from our Puritan founders. “The direct lines are few,” stresses David D. Hall, a professor of New England church history, “mostly because of industrialization and immigration” and other factors that have led to immense social change.

But were Tocqueville to land on our shores today, with a bit of squinting he would probably see some of the same evidence of our Puritan destiny as he did nearly two centuries ago.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Still Puritan After All These Years / New York Times

  1. This is going to sound weird: the new world spoke freedom – to act, to let out the darkness within, to hide nothing; and human nature erupted its hidden psychopathy under the cover of darksome virtue, once the shackles of a greater power were cast off.

    (If I recall correctly, the puritans wore black commonly)

    Someone else – perhaps Burroughs, he of opiate fame – wrote that this country was always old and bloody with death and destruction. It is its nature; and we who live upon it abide in that nature, and have all become death, that corrupter of worlds.

    Like

    • This may sound weird? No, not at all; that’s exactly it. “Psychopathy” does erupt from under the cover of “virtue” – history shows that again and again. My point about “virtuous” Puritanical psychology, psychiatry and the behavioral “sciences” being rooted in the same “Old Testament” arrogance. What is arrogance? The overthrow of Nature as the “creative force” and replacement of its “instructions” with manmade “social order” The psychopaths who wrote the OT, as a compilation of “male madness” were so “clever” – put it all in writing, providing a “blueprint” and rationalization (the WORD of GOD) for suffering, violence and destruction – the “cosmic” forces (gods) were replaced by Man. So easy! Here are the magic words… “believe and submit” Insanity becomes “godly”, virtuous and final.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s