Remember while reading the following standard model of EuroAmerican evolutionary fantasy, that there were no white people until a mutation for light skin occurred less than 10,000 years ago during the agricultural revolution.
Here we go!
Homo sapiens – modern humans
(Summary on the Australian Museum Website)
All people living today belong to the species Homo sapiens.
We evolved only relatively recently but with complex culture and technology have been able to spread throughout the world and occupy a range of different environments. This resulted in a species that is highly variable in physical appearance, despite the fact that we are almost genetically identical to each other.
In this section, Homo sapiens is defined by “date.”
Archaic Homo sapiens from 300,000 years ago; Modern Homo sapiens from about 160,000 years ago
Various names have been used for our species including:
- ‘Cro-Magnon Man’ is commonly used for the modern humans that inhabited Europe from about 40,000 to 10,000 years ago. (African origin)
- The term ‘archaic’ Homo sapiens has sometimes been used for African fossils dated between 300,000 and 150,000 years of age that are difficult to classify due to a mixture of modern and archaic features. Some scientists prefer to place these fossils in a separate species, Homo helmei.
- Homo sapiens sapiens is the name given to our species if we are considered a sub-species of a larger group. This name is used by those that describe the specimen from Herto, Ethiopia as Homo sapiens idàltu or by those who believed that modern humans and the Neanderthals were members of the same species. (The Neanderthals were called Homo sapiens neanderthalensis in this scheme).
Major fossil sites of early Homo sapiens
“early” = Archaic, or is this use of language arbitrary? In this section the division-definition AHS / MHS is geographic; if you find an Archaic-looking skull outside of Africa, it can’t be Archaic.
Fossils of the earliest members of our species, archaic Homo sapiens, have all been found in Africa. Fossils of modern Homo sapiens have been found in Africa and in many other sites across much of the world. Sites older than 150k include Florisbad, Omo-Kibish, Ngaloba and Herto. Sites dating to about 100k include Klasies River Mouth, Border Cave, Skhul and Qafzeh. Sites younger than 40k include Dolni Vestonice, Cro-Magnon, Aurignac and Lake Mungo.
Relationships with other species
Homo sapiens evolved in Africa from Homo heidelbergensis. They co-existed for a long time in Europe and the Middle East with the Neanderthals, and possibly with Homo erectus in Asia and Homo floresiensis in Indonesia, but are now the only surviving human species. For information on modern humans interbreeding with other human species see australianmuseum.net.au/When-and-where-did-our-species-originate.
The transition to modern humans.
In this section Homo heidelbergensis is the pre-cursor to all Homo sapiens, BUT:
Smithsonian Human Origins: H. heidelbergensis: Year of Discovery: 1908
History of Discovery:
In 1908 near Heidelberg, Germany, a workman found the type specimen of H. heidelbergensis in the Rösch sandpit just north of the village of Mauer. This mandible was nearly complete except for the missing premolars and first two left molars; it is heavily built and lacks a chin. German scientist Otto Schoentensack was the first to describe the specimen and proposed the species name Homo heidelbergensis.
Before the naming of this species, scientists referred to early human fossils showing traits similar to both Homo erectus and modern humans as ‘archaic’ Homo sapiens.
This designates Archaic Homo sapiens to be a “transitional grab bag” for all “finds” which look a bit like H. erectus / H. sapiens – and elevates this bag of bones to the status of “species” – H. heidelbergensis.
If all Archaic Homo sapiens, by definition, belong in Africa prior to 160,000 y.a., and if Homo sapiens evolved in Africa from H. heidelbergensis prior to 300,000 y.a. – then how can a PRE-Homo sapiens species, from which Homo sapiens evolved, be an Archaic Homo sapiens – OR any Homo sapiens?
African fossils provide the best evidence for the evolutionary transition from Homo heidelbergensis to archaic Homo sapiens and then to early modern Homo sapiens. There is, however, some difficulty in placing many of the transitional specimens into a particular species because they have a mixture of intermediate features which are especially apparent in the sizes and shapes of the forehead, brow ridge and face. Some suggest the name Homo helmei for these intermediate specimens that represent populations on the brink of becoming modern. Homo helmi = Homo heidelbergensis?
Late surviving populations of archaic Homo sapiens and Homo heidelbergensis lived alongside early modern Homo sapiens before disappearing from the fossil record by about 100,000 years ago. Key specimens that reveal an evolutionary transition from archaic to modern Homo sapiens include Florisbad cranium, LH18 from Laetoli, Omo 1 and 2 from Omo-Kibish, Herto skull from Ethiopia and Skhul 5 from Israel.
Important specimens: Late early modern (this is embarrassing!) Homo sapiens
Late Early Modern appears to be 32,000 y.a. – 10,000 y.a. as presented here. Remember, Archaic = early is African prior to 160,000 y.a. and Modern is “after that” everywhere. A “late early modern” specimen is utterly confusing – it could be both Archaic Homo sapiens AND Modern Homo sapiens, depending on what the adjectives “late” and “early” actually refer to! It’s clumsy; it’s stupid!
- Liujiang – a skull discovered in 1958 in Guanxi province, South China. Age is uncertain, but at least 15,000 years old. This skull lacks the typically northern Asian features found in modern populations from those regions, lending support to popular theories that such features only arose in the last 8000 years.
- Aurignac – skull discovered in Aurignac, France. The first Aurignac fossils were accidentally found in 1852. A workman digging a trench in a hillside found a cave that had been blocked by rock but after clearing away the debris he found 17 skeletons. The skeletons were taken to a local cemetery for burial but later investigations indicated that the skeletons were actually up to 10,000 years old.
- Cro-Magnon 1 – a 32,000-year-old skull discovered in 1868 in Cro-Magnon rockshelter, Les Eyzies, France. This adult male represents the oldest known skull of a modern human from western Europe. Cro-Magnon skeletons have proportions similar to those of modern Africans rather than modern Europeans. This suggests that the Cro-Magnons had migrated from a warmer climate and had a relatively recent African ancestry.
Important specimens: Early modern Homo sapiens
Jump to: more recent than 160,000 y.a. but older than 32,000 y.a.???
Herto – a 160,000-year-old partial skull discovered in1997 in Herto, Ethiopia. This skull from an adult male and those of another adult and a child were found in 1997 and publicly announced in 2003. They are some of the oldest fossils of modern Homo sapiens yet discovered. Some scientists regard these fossils as a sub-species of modern humans (named Homo sapiens idàltu) because of some slight differences in their skull features. They show a suite of modern human traits, mixed with archaic and early modern features. (Would this not make them Homo heidelbergensis = archaic Homo sapiens = Homo helmi specimens?) Also of significance are cut marks on the child’s skull. These were made when the bone was still fresh in a manner indicating ritual practice. The skull also appeared ‘polished’ from repeated handling before it was laid in the ground.
- Omo 1 – a partial skull discovered in1967 in Omo-Kibish, Ethiopia. A recently published date for this skull was about 195,000 years old, but this is disputed. However, it is still one of the oldest known fossils of early modern Homo sapiens. Features which show the transition from an archaic to an early modern Homo sapiens include a more rounded and expanded braincase and a high forehead. Now dated to the same age as Omo 2, it does raise interesting questions about why it appears to have slightly more advanced features than Omo 2. Were they from the same population? Aye, yai, yai!
- Skhul 5 – a 90,000-year-old skull discovered in1932 in Skhul Cave, Mount Carmel, Israel. This skull of an adult male has developed relatively modern features including a higher forehead although it still retains some archaic features including a brow ridge and slightly projecting face. This specimen and others from the Middle East are the oldest known traces of modern humans outside of Africa. They prove that Homo sapiens had started to spread out of Africa by 100,000 years ago, although it may be that these remains represent a population that did not expand beyond this region – with migrations to the rest of the world occurring later, about 60-70,000 years ago.
Important specimens: Archaic Homo sapiens
(Africa prior to 160,000 y.a.; Homo heidelbergensis)
- LH 18 – skull discovered in 1976 in Ngaloba, Laetoli, Tanzania. Age is about 120,000 years old (but debated). This skull is transitional between Homo heidelbergensis and early modern Homo sapiens. It has a number of primitive features but also has some modern characteristics such as a reduced brow ridge and smaller facial features. The late date of this specimen indicates that archaic humans lived alongside modern populations for some time.
- Florisbad – a 260,000-year-old partial cranium discovered in 1932 in Florisbad, South Africa. This skull shows features intermediate between Homo heidelbergensis and early modern Homo sapiens. The face is broad and massive but still relatively flat and the forehead is approaching the modern form.
- Omo 2 – a 195,000-year-old braincase discovered in 1967 in Omo-Kibish, Ethiopia. Like LH 18, this braincase shows a blend of primitive and modern features that places it as a member of a population transitional between Homo heidelbergensis and early modern Homo sapiens. (so, this individual “jumped over” Archaic Homo sapiens and went directly to having Modern Homo sapiens features, or is it a “throwback”?) Its primitive features include a heavier, more robust construction; an angled rather than rounded rear section; and a lower, sloping forehead. Refer to Omo 1 specimen for interesting comparisons.
Key physical features
Homo sapiens skulls have a distinctive shape that differentiates them from earlier human species. (Except for all those confusing specimens that don’t) Their body shape tends to vary, however, due to adaptation to a wide range of environments.
Body size and shape
- the earliest Homo sapiens (300,000 y.a.) had bodies with short, slender trunks and long limbs. These body proportions are an adaptation for surviving in tropical regions due to the greater proportion of skin surface available for cooling the body. More stocky builds gradually evolved when populations spread to cooler regions, as an adaptation that helped the body retain heat. Are there no sub-Saharan Africans with stocky builds? Has anyone noticed that sub-Saharan Africans (and Asians) are totally ignored in these “histories”?
- Modern humans now have an average height of about 160 centimetres in females and 175 centimetres in males. What crap! There IS NO average “modern human”. “Modern” indicates all Homo sapiens since 160,000 y.a.: or does it? Present day Homo sapiens come in a HUGE range of sizes and shapes.
- Homo sapiens living today have an average brain size of about 1350 cubic centimetres which makes-up 2.2% of our body weight. There ARE NO AVERAGE brains, only specific brains. Early Homo sapiens, (who is this – Archaic Homo sapiens?) however, had slightly larger brains at nearly 1500 cubic centimetres.
Try applying these generalized requirements to ALL existing present-day Homo sapiens skulls: using neotenic “dome head skulls” as the standard would disqualify most present day – and most previous – Homo sapiens from being Homo sapiens.)
- modern Homo sapiens skulls (160,000 y.a. to present) have a short base and a high braincase. Unlike other species of Homo, the skull is broadest at the top. The fuller braincase also results in almost no post-orbital constriction or narrowing behind the eye sockets
- back of the skull is rounded and indicates a reduction in neck muscles
- face is reasonably small with a projecting nose bone
- brow ridge is limited and the forehead is tall
- orbits (eye sockets) are square rather than round
- jaws are short which result in an almost vertical face
- usually no gap (retromolar space) between the last molar teeth and the jaw bone
- jaws are lightly built and have a protruding bony chin for added strength. Homo sapiens is the only species to have a protruding chin.
- shortened jaw has affected the arrangement of the teeth within the jaw. They are now arranged in a parabolic shape in which the side rows of teeth splay outwards rather than remain parallel as in our earliest long jawed ancestors.
- teeth are relatively small compared with earlier species. This is especially noticeable in the front incisor and canine teeth.
- front premolar teeth in the lower jaw have two equal-sized cusps (bumps on the chewing surface)
Limbs and pelvis (ridiculous generalizations)
- limb bones are thinner and less robust than earlier human species and indicate a reduction in muscle size from earlier humans.
- legs are relatively long compared with the arms.
- finger and toe bones are straight and without the curvature typical of our earliest australopithecine ancestors.
- pelvis is narrower from side-to-side and has a deeper bowl-shape from front-to-back than previous human species. (Male pelvis? What about the variations obvious in female Homo sapiens?)
Culture and technology
The earliest Homo sapiens had a relatively simple culture, although it was more advanced than any previous species. Rare evidence for symbolic behaviour appears at a number of African sites about 100,000 years ago, but these artistic expressions appear more of a flicker of creativity than a sustained expression. (We’re novel-writing again! This shameless subjective “generalizing” is pure EuroAmerican projection on the part of “white males”.) It is not until about 40,000 years ago that complex and highly innovative cultures appear and include behaviour that we would recognise as typical of modern humans today.
Many researchers believe this explosion of artistic material in the archaeological record about 40,000 years ago is due to a change in human cognition – perhaps humans developed a greater ability to think and communicate symbolically or memorise better. However, as there are obvious attempts at art before this, perhaps there are other reasons. One theory is that population size and structure play a key role as social learning is considered more beneficial to developing complex culture than individual innovations are. Bigger populations often accumulate more cultural attributes than isolated groups. Total BS – utterly unprovable bias that “innovation” is a group hug. INDIVIDUALS are the source of invention, whether or not they exist in small or large groups.
Initially, Homo sapiens (300,000 y.a.) made stone tools such as flakes, scrapers and points that were similar in design to those made by the Neanderthals (Homo neanderthalensis).This technology appeared about 250,000 years ago, coinciding with the probable first appearance of early (Archaic?) Homo sapiens. It required an ability for abstract thought to mentally plan a series of steps that could then be executed. This is NOT true. Concrete visual cognition easily accomplishes this. Only a small number of tools were produced from each core (the original stone selected for shaping) but the tools produced by this prepared-core method maximised the cutting edge available. Historically, archaeologists used different terminologies for Lower Palaeolithic cultures in different parts of the world. Many of these terms are now consolidated within the Mode 3 technology to emphasise the similarities between these technologies.
As more sophisticated techniques developed in some parts of the world, this early Mode 3 technology was replaced by either Mode 4 or Mode 5 technology and the use of a wider range of materials including bone, ivory and antler. Mode 4 technology first appeared in Africa about 100,000 years ago. It is characterised by the production of long, thin stone flakes that were shaped into long blade knives, spearheads and other tools. Mode 5 technology specialised in the production of very small blades (microliths) that were often used in composite tools having several parts. These tools included small-headed arrows, barbed spears and sickles. Regional variation in these tool cultures developed with an influx of new styles and techniques especially within the last 40,000 years, including the Magdalenian and Aurignacian.
Sophisticated (as opposed to unsophisticated? What does this mean? Are these tools equivalent in development to present day technologies? Too many undefined adjectives are being thrown around!) control of fire, including complex hearths, pits and kilns, allowed Homo sapiens (from 300,000 y.a. ?) to survive in regions that even the cold-adapted Neanderthals had been unable to inhabit. (Take that, you stupid brutes. Novel-writing, not science. )
The Cro-Magnon site (remember – Cro-Magnon are Out-of-Africa migrants) site at Dolni Vestonice in the Czech Republic produced the earliest evidence for high temperature kilns and ceramic technology. The kilns, dated at 26,000 years old, were capable of firing clay figurines at temperatures over 400 degrees Celsius. About 2000 fired lumps of clay were found scattered around the kiln.
Clothing and personal adornment
Animal hide clothing may have been worn in cooler areas, although direct evidence of clothing only exists for the last 30,000 years. This evidence includes specialised tools such as needles; adornments such as buttons and beads sewn onto clothing; and the remains of animals, such as arctic foxes and wolves, that indicate they were trapped for their fur. Clothes that were sewn provided better protection from the cold than clothes that were merely tied together. Really? Again, this refers to Eurasian Homo sapiens. Where is everyone else, and what are they doing – wearing?
Fibres from flax plants were discovered in a cave in Georgia in 2009, dating to about 36,000 years old. The flax was most likely used to make clothes and woven baskets, and a small number appear to be dyed. They are the oldest example of their kind ever found. Textile impressions have been discovered at other European sites have, but no actual remains.
Items of personal adornment not sewn onto clothing include ivory, shell, amber, bone and tooth beads and pendants. Ostrich eggshell beads that date from about 45,000 years ago have been found in Africa, as well as pierced shell beads in Morocco dating to 80,000 years ago and marine shell beads from Israel dating to 90,000 years old, but body adornment only become prolific from about 35,000 years ago.
All of this is based on the teeny-tiny number of sites – and miniscule “data” as to what Homo sapiens have been up to for the last 300,000 years. Weaving together info from specific sites that are hundreds to thousands of miles apart, and separated in time by thousands of years IS NOVEL-WRITING! This compulsion to “historicize” objects and imaginary behaviors into a “story” of “how we became human” is cultural in intent and plagues inquiries into actual events.
One of the earliest known pendants is a horse carved in mammoth ivory from Vogelherd, Germany. It is dated at 32,000 years old. Body adornments like this are evidence that humans had progressed from merely trying to survive and were now concerned with their appearance. Aye, yai, yai! As of 32,000 y.a., Homo sapiens could relax about survival, and turned their interest into impressing everyone at cocktail parties and other social gatherings.
Cave art began to be produced about 40,000 years ago in Europe and Australia. Do we credit these Australians with a leap in cognition, as Europeans demonstrate?” Most of the art depicts animals or probable spiritual beings, (how trite and lazy!) but smaller marks in many caves in France, and possibly others in Europe, are now being analysed as they may be a written ‘code’ familiar to many prehistoric tribes. In particular, 26 symbols appear over and over again across thousand of years, some of them in pairs and groups in what could be a rudimentary ‘language’. These suggest that early Europeans were attempting to represent ideas symbolically rather than realistically (and we all know that symbolic-supernatural thinking is “better than” realistic perception. Neurotypicals demonstrate this superiority in befuddled thinking 24/7) and share information across generations. Of course, these people had a historical “socially modern” concept of time! The oldest of these symbols date to about 30,000 years old.
Evidence of musical instruments first appeared about 32,000 years ago in Europe. Palaeolithic bone flutes and whistles from various sites in France range in age from 30,000 to 10,000 years old.
Portable artwork, such as carved statuettes, first appeared about 35-40,000 years ago in Europe. Venus figurines (that look suspiciously African) were widespread in Europe by 28,000 years ago. Fragments from Germany found in 2009, suggest their origins started at least 35,000 years ago. An ivory female head with bun from Dolni Vestonice, Czech Republic, is one of only 2 human head carvings from this period that show eye sockets, eyelids and eyeballs. It is dated at 26,000 years old.
Of course, the 99.9% of artefacts and other specific evidence that have not been found, and may never be found, is ignored. In neurotypical fashion, 2 data points (heads) qualify as “proof” of “conceptual absolutism” – the entire species Homo sapiens is “magically converted” to a new level of “sophistication” by the activities of one individual in one location.
Red ochre pieces from Blombos Cave in South Africa, dating to about 100-80,000 years ago, show evidence of engraving that may be an expression of art or simply incidental marking made during other activities. However, other signs of possible symbolic behaviour, including shell beads and sophisticated tools (known as Still Bay points) have also come from this site, strengthening the case for early artistic expression. The concept of “art” as opposed to craft is a very recent distinction.
The reality that pre-domesticated, pre “word conscious” humans were VISUAL THINKERS is never considered.
Settlement (Blah, blah, blah)
Early Homo sapiens often inhabited caves or rock shelters if these were available. More recently, especially within the last 20,000 years, natural shelters were enhanced with walls or other simple modifications. In open areas, shelters were constructed using a range of framework materials including wooden poles and the bones of large animals, such as mammoths. These structures were probably covered with animal hides and the living areas included fire hearths.
Living sites were much larger than those occupied by earlier humans and a comparison with modern traditional peoples suggests that clans consisted of between 25 and 100 members.
Burial (Blah, blah, blah)
Burials were infrequent and very simple prior to 40,000 years ago and then began to become more elaborate with the inclusion of valued objects such as tools and body adornments. Red ochre was sprinkled over many of the bodies prior to burial.
One of the earliest deliberate burials of a modern human comes from Jebel Qafzeh in Israel. Dating to 90,000 years old, the grave contains the bones of a young woman buried with a young child at her feet. An additional 21 skeletons were found in the same cave.
Environment and diet (Blah, blah, blah)
Early modern humans were adapted to life in the tropics but by 40,000 years ago they occupied a range of environments across the continents of Africa, Europe, Asia and Australia. Within the last 20,000 years humans have also spread into the Americas. Today, our culture and technology allows us to live in most environments on our planet as well as some off our planet.
All Homo sapiens were once hunter-gatherers living on wild plants and animals. It was only about 11,000 years ago that humans began to domesticate plants and animals although wild foods still remained important in the diet. Our species has a wide-ranging and essentially omnivorous diet. This has enabled us to utilise the food resources found in the wide variety of environments we inhabit.
Fran Dorey , Exhibition Project Coordinator
Last Updated: 30 October 2015