This is Lecture 2 of 25
Features Game Theory and Tournament Species – Pair Bonding Species
This is Lecture 2 of 25
Features Game Theory and Tournament Species – Pair Bonding Species
The first ten Amendments are known as the Bill of Rights, which (supposedly) protect all American citizens from abuse by government. But, despite the intention of the originators of these protections, “rights” have been denied, twisted and interpreted to “benefit” the decidedly unequal social hierarchy / class system that is the United States.
CIVIL RIGHTS is a magic word concept that carries all sorts of social and legal messages, that are repeated over and over again by media, bureaucrats, Congresspersons, the President, judges – and citizens. “Rights” are a political and legal illusion, open to perversion, lies and misapplication: Does anyone truly believe that a poor person has any comparable “value” to American society and the state? This is how rights are applied: by wealth, social standing and influence.
I’ve included the Bill of Rights in this post as reference for the most sinister practice I have yet come across in the “Injustice System” – questionnaires “invented” by psychologists and sociologists, that use algorithms to “crunch” the (highly)questionable information provided by “suspects” “accused” “convicted” citizens which are then used to determine the particular “judgements” made about their “future crimes”
Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.
THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.
RESOLVED by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as amendments to the Constitution of the United States, all, or any of which Articles, when ratified by three fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of the said Constitution; viz.
ARTICLES in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petitition the Government for a redress of grievances. Many religious organizations in the U.S. have as their primary goal, the overturning of this injunction against the establishment of a state religion.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner; nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself; nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation. (This protection is being trampled to death by the “assessments” created by social scientists and psychologists that have been used increasingly by the justice-court-incarceration system)
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed; which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor; and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense. 95 % of cases are “PLEA BARGAINS” coerced into acceptance by a system that imposes severe punishment for choosing a jury trial.
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise reexamined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of common law.
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
Cruel and unusual? Mentally ill individuals locked up with violent criminals; solitary confinement for “vulnerable” inmates; life sentences for non-violent crime…..
Poor people often cannot afford any amount of bail, and SIT IN JAIL, sometimes for months or years, before the “case” gets around to court hearings. And then what happens? Charges dropped, a release, a plea bargain, probation? A sentence equal to time spent locked up and waiting for a court appearance? The outcome depends on how backlogged and inefficient the system has become; on selection of easy targets by prosecutors (will accept any plea bargain) Prisoners, felons, convicts whose identity has become a function of the “social discrimination” of American life since childhood, become helpless targets. People with access to money and lawyers can of course, purchase a “fair outcome.”
The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Robert Sapolsky, STANFORD
Course (25 lectures) Biology of Behavior. How physiology affects human behavior, especially social behavior. Painless (and funny) Sapolsky classic.
Limits of categorical thinking: Breaking down “bucket” thinking. How wrong (and dangerous) “scientists” can be who are stuck in categorical thinking. Psychiatrists and psychologists as generators of pathological ideas about human behavior – which I’ve been yelling about for two years on this blog.
For general consumption! Science background not required.
Homeschooling has been legal throughout the United States for about 25 years, but regulations vary dramatically by state. Only two states require background checks for parents who choose to homeschool, and just ten require parents to have a high school degree. Fewer than half require any kind of evaluation or testing of homeschooled children. Use the map below to compare how these regulations vary by state. Related Story » (How child abusers use home schooling to hide crimes)
A few highlights: See original article for map / charts for each state. .
Sex offenders must not live in the home. Parents can petition for this to be waived.
Parents must be “capable” of teaching. No law defines what this means, and officials are not allowed to exercise discretion.
Parents must be “competent” instructors. No law defines what this means, and officials are not allowed to exercise discretion.
Periodic assessment or evaluation. Allows for philosophical, moral or religious exemption if the parent meets certain educational qualifications.
Parents prevented from homeschooling for five years after a range of criminal convictions.
(requirement to teach) High School Diploma. Allows for parents to waive this requirement if they can prove their ability to teach, makes exception if students are following a distance learning curriculum, and provides an exception for religious beliefs.
Terrifying self-centered parent Aye, yai, yai! It’s all about what’s convenient for her…
SCINEWS Online Scientists Produce Map of Neanderthal, Denisovan Ancestry in Present-Day Humans
Dr. David Reich from Harvard Medical School and his colleagues have produced a world map of Denisovan and Neanderthal ancestry in 120 diverse populations. Their analysis proposes that Denisovan admixture into humans occurred about 100 generations after Neanderthal admixture.
Dr. Reich and co-authors collected their data by comparing known Neanderthal and Denisovan gene sequences across more than 250 genomes from 120 non-African populations publically available through the Simons Genome Diversity Project.
The analysis was carried out by a machine-learning algorithm that could differentiate between components of both kinds of ancestral DNA, which are more similar to one another than to modern humans. The results, published this week in the journal Current Biology, showed that individuals from Oceania possess the highest percentage of archaic ancestry and South Asians possess more Denisovan ancestry than previously believed.
“We developed methods that can disambiguate the locations of segments of Denisovan and Neanderthal ancestry in present-day humans and applied them to 257 high-coverage genomes from 120 diverse populations, among which were 20 individual Oceanians with high Denisovan ancestry,” the scientists explained.
“In Oceanians, the average size of Denisovan fragments is larger than Neanderthal fragments, implying a more recent average date of Denisovan admixture in the history of these populations. We document more Denisovan ancestry in South Asia than is expected based on existing models of history, reflecting a previously undocumented mixture related to archaic humans.”
In contrast, Western Eurasians are the non-Africans least likely to have Neanderthal or Denisovan genes. “The interactions between modern humans and archaic humans are complex and perhaps involved multiple events,” Dr. Reich said.
Sriram Sankararaman et al. The Combined Landscape of Denisovan and Neanderthal Ancestry in Present-Day Humans. Current Biology, published online March 28, 2016; doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.037
Published online 6 March 2003 | Nature | doi:10.1038/news030303-6
Ten-million-year-old fossil teeth turn up in Thailand. by
An ancient relative of the orangutan has been discovered in Thailand. The species is the first fossil ape unearthed in the area where orangutans live today. Only teeth have been found so far. These bear an “amazing resemblance” to orangutan teeth, says the fossil’s discoverer, Jean-Jacques Jaeger of the University of Montpellier, France. “It’s more similar [to orangutans] than any other fossil ape,” he enthuses.
Like the orangutan, the newly discovered species, named Lufengpithecus chiangmuanensis by Jaeger and his colleagues1, probably weighed about 70 kilograms. It lived in the tropical forests of northern Thailand between 10 and 13.5 million years ago.
The finding opens a window onto new times and places in the apes’ paltry fossil record, says palaeontologist Peter Andrews of the Natural History Museum in London. “This is just the beginning,” he says. “There will be lots of species all over Southeast Asia.” But Lufengpithecus is almost certainly not an ancestor of the orangutan. It joins a group of fossil apes that ranged from Europe to China around 10 million years ago. Researchers have little idea about how they were related to one another.
Most of the orangutan’s extinct relatives are known only from skulls and teeth. The exception – Sivapithecus, which lived in modern-day Pakistan – had a face like an orangutan, but few other similarities. Its skeleton shows it to have walked on all fours, like a baboon.
No known fossil ape is adapted for life in the trees, says Jaeger. Orangutans may therefore be descended from a ground-dweller, or it may be that no known fossil is an ancestor of a living ape.
Comparing teeth is not always a good guide to animal relationships, warns oral biologist Jay Kelley of the University of Illinois in Chicago. “Animals that are very similar dentally have turned out to be very different.”
Kelley has found two other species of Lufengpithecus, with intact skulls, in southern China. “There’s a lot about those skulls that doesn’t look at all like an orangutan,” he says. Both are several million years younger than the Thai species.
The orangutan is the only great ape with a known fossil record. Mysteriously, no African fossil has been found that might be related to chimps and gorillas. “The apes seem to have sprung out of nowhere,” says Andrews.
Published online 18 November 2004 | Nature | doi:10.1038/news041115-12
Fossil from 13 million years ago sheds light on human split from apes. by
Fossil hunters in Spain have unearthed what seems to be the most recent common ancestor of gorillas, chimpanzees, orangutans and humans. The ape lived almost 13 million years ago, about the time that our different lineages are thought to have diverged.
The species has been christened Pierolapithecus catalaunicus, in reference to the Catalan village of Els Hostalets de Pierola, where the fossil was found. The specimen consists of 83 bones from an adult male, including parts of the skull, teeth, ribs and fingers.
“The problem is that our finding is the only one we know. However, we can speculate and suggest that the probable origin of this animal is in Africa.”
Miguel Crusafont Institute of Palaeontology, Barcelona
The creature would have weighed about 55 kilograms, making it about the size of a female chimpanzee, says Salvador Moyá-Solá of the Miquel Crusafont Institute of Palaeontology in Barcelona, whose team reports the discovery in this week’s Science1. But it would have looked more like a primitive gorilla, he adds.
The scarcity of the fossil record makes it difficult to say whether P. catalaunicus is actually the most recent common ancestor of all great apes living today, Moyá-Solá says. But it is likely to resemble it closely: analyses of the rates at which differences arise between our DNA and that of other apes show that our family must have begun diverging at about the time when P. catalaunicus was alive.
Intriguingly, the fossil shows a mixture of typical ‘apelike’ features alongside more primitive ‘monkey’ characteristics, the team reports. The creature would have been able to lift itself into a standing position as modern apes can, but its short fingers mean that it would not have been able to grip branches with enough strength to swing from them.
This means that tree-swinging might have evolved several times in different apes, rather than being a habit from the start, the researchers suggest. The earliest great apes might have scuttled around on top of branches, much as today’s monkeys do.
This fits with the idea that apelike characteristics evolved very gradually, rather than all appearing together in a single ancestor, comments Todd Rae, who studies primates at the University of Durham, UK. “It’s a stepwise process,” he explains. “One bit changes and then another bit changes.”
P. catalaunicus also has a very flat face, Moyá-Solá’s team reports, with nostrils that are in almost the same plane as its eye sockets. Its face would have looked a lot like a gorilla’s does today, but very different from a chimp’s, in which the jaw is thrust forwards in a pattern called prognathism. The chimp pattern therefore probably evolved later in the great apes’ family history.
Although the species was discovered in Spain, it is unlikely to have lived only there, Moyá-Solá says. “The problem is that our finding is the only one we know. However, we can speculate and suggest that the probable origin of this animal is Africa.”
Africa is widely agreed to have been the birthplace of modern humans around 160,000 years ago. But palaeontologists also think that Africa’s climate, and the number of different species that lived there, would have made it a hotbed of ape evolution for millions of years before that. But the apes could just as easily have been found mainly in Europe, as its climate was certainly different back then, Rae argues. “At that time Europe had lots of different apes – you don’t necessarily have to invoke Africa as the place where all these things evolved.”
Of course, we will not know where else P. catalaunicus lived until other fossils are found. “We always need more and better fossils,” says Moyá-Solá.
Miguel Crusafont Institute of Palaeontology, Barcelona
Department of Animal Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado. Genetics and the Behavior of Domestic Animals / Academic Press 1998
Much, much more at: http://www.grandin.com/references/genetics.html
Price (1984) defined domestication as a process by which a population of animals becomes adapted to man and the captive environment by some combination of genetic changes occurring over generations and environmentally induced developmental events recurring during each generation:’ In long-term selection experiments designed to study the consequences of selection for the tame” domesticated type of behavior, Belyaev (1979) and Belyaev et al. (1981) studied foxes reared for their fur. The red fox (Vulpes fulva) has been raised on seminatural fur farms for over 100 years and was selected for fur traits and not behavioral traits. However, they demonstrate three distinctly different characteristic responses to man. Thirty percent were extremely aggressive toward man, 60% were either fearful or fearfully aggressive, and 10% displayed a quiet exploratory reaction without either fear or aggression. (Note that individual foxes have varied temperaments – as do humans.) The objective of this experiment was to breed animals similar in behavior to the domestic dog. By selecting and breeding the tamest individuals, 20 years later the experiment succeeded in turning wild foxes into tame, border collie-like fox-dogs. The highly selected “tame” population of (fox-dog) foxes actively sought human contact and would whine and wag their tails when people approached (Belyaev 1979). This behavior was in sharp contrast to wild foxes which showed extremely aggressive and fearful behavior toward man. Keeler et al. (1970) described this behavior:
Vulpes fulva (the wild fox) is a bundle of jangled nerves. We had observed that when first brought into captivity as an adult, the red fox displays a number of symptoms that are in many ways similar to those observed in psychosis. They resemble a wide variety of phobias, especially fear of open spaces, movement, white objects, sounds, eyes or lenses, large objects, and man, and they exhibit panic, anxiety, fear, apprehension and a deep trust of the environment~ They are 1) catalepsy-like frozen positions, accompanied by blank stares; 2) fear of sitting down; 3) withdrawal; 4) runaway flight reactions; and 5) aggressiveness. Sometimes the strain of captivity makes them deeply disturbed and confused, or may produce a depression- like state. Extreme excitation and restlessness may also be observed in some individuals in response to many changes in the physical environment. Most adult red foxes soon after capture break off their canine teeth on the mesh of our expanded metal cage in their attempts to escape. A newly captured fox is known to have torn at the wooden door of his cage in a frenzy until he dropped dead from exhaustion.
I know how you feel, Buddy! This is a good description of how Aspergers react to social confinement.
Although the stress of domestication is great, Belyaev (1979) and Belyaev et al. (1981) concluded that selection for tameness was effective in spite of the many undesirable characteristics associated with tameness. For example, the tame foxes shed during the wrong season and developed black and white patterned fur, and changes were found in their hormone profiles.
Furthermore, changes in behavior occurred simultaneously with changes in tail position and ear shape, and the appearance of a white muzzle, forehead blaze, and white shoulder hair. The white color pattern on the head is similar to many domestic animals (Belyaev 1979) (Figs. 1.1 and 1.2). The most dog-like foxes had white spots and patterns on their heads, drooping ears, and curled tails and looked more like dogs than the foxes that avoided people. The behavioral and morphological (appearance) changes were also correlated with corresponding changes in the levels of gender hormones. The tame foxes had higher levels of the neurotransmitter serotonin (Popova et al., 1975). Serotonin is known to inhibit some kinds of aggression (Belyaev, 1979), and serotonin ~levels are increased in the brains of people who take Prozac (fluoxetine).
The study of behavioral genetics can help explain why selection for calm temperament was linked to physical and neurochemical changes in Belyaev’s foxes. Behavior geneticists and animal scientists are interested in understanding effects on behavior due to genetic influences or those which are due to environment and learning.